During the previous investigation on figuring out the angles of a right triangle if you know their side lengths, some very
intelligent people brought up a few questions.
- Do you see any pattern in the way that the numbers change?
- What kind of data will be most helpful? How do you think it will be more helpful to organize your data?
- Do you think it is possible to predict the angles of a triangle when you know their side lengths?
1.By looking at the chart from my previous blog, I saw a pattern in the way that Angle B changed in the first set of sides and angles, before the break. The pattern that I saw is that the measurement of Angle B increased by 4, not exactly 4 but close to it. The pattern does not continue throughout the entire table, but continues for most of the table except the beginning and the end.
2. The data table was helpful for the fact that it put all my information next to each other so that I could see it better. I think a better way to organize this information by still using the chart is keep all the parts that are changing in one group, so I can see how they interact. This will be more helpful because the other information around makes it harder to focus on that one part of the triangle.
3. I do think that it is possible to figure out the angles of a triangle when you only know the side lengths. Maybe not by making a chart with the sides and angles they make, like I did. But possibly if I knew more things about triangles it would be easier. For example I know that if two triangles have the same side lengths they have the same angle measurements too, due to the Side-Side-Side Congruence Shortcut that I learned. Which basically says if I have a triangle that have the exact same lengths they will also have the same size angles. So there most likely is a way to figure out the angles of a triangle by knowing the side lengths.